King Kaysar?
I enjoy the idea that Kaysar nominates people just to see who will align where. Will this come back and bite him in the butt? I'll bet yes. The thing is, Will is right: on one hand they should all be ganging up on him and getting him out ASAP. On the other, who better to bring with you to final two than he? Will fellow BBers really give it to him again? Plus the idea of getting rid of all the players who play under the radar and coast to the finals is a great one and it protects the two major alliances and will eventually pit them against each other. It'll be interesting to see what happens in the end and if Kaysar's plan backfires. It ended seemingly with him willing to use the veto if needed; like he put up Nakomis and Diane to see where people would fall.
posted by B at
10:43 PM
3 Comments:
I am disliking Mike more and more all the time but having him in the house will keep things interesting I guess. I think Nakomis and Diane were good choices....they don't seem to add too much. I didn't watch their season of BB so I don't know if they are really good players or not. George is just silly and taking up space so keeping him around isn't bad.
By
Random Musings, at 8:21 AM
Except George could coast to the end. It looks like Kaysar is trying to set up the sequester house (the ones who vote), by keeping the other strong alliance in the house to battle it out with his. Nakomis is a very strong player, very mental. Like Kaysar, she made a bold move at the wrong time and got booted her season earlier than she should have. Diane made it to final three her season so she's pretty crafty, but again, coasts on others plans. Kaysar is trying to get rid of those who will sit back and let others eat away at each other.
Or you can follow my conspiracy theory that BB is behind this and has made Kaysar and Will agree not to boot each other or their alliances till the end for ratings purposes....
By
B, at 9:48 AM
I love conspiracy theories!
By
Random Musings, at 12:36 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home